This site is for mothers of kids in the U.S. Navy and for Moms who have questions about Navy life for their kids.

FIRST TIME HERE?

FOLLOW THESE STEPS TO GET STARTED:

Choose your Username.  For the privacy and safety of you and/or your sailor, NO LAST NAMES ARE ALLOWED, even if your last name differs from that of your sailor (please make sure your URL address does not include your last name either).  Also, please do not include your email address in your user name. Go to "Settings" above to set your Username.  While there, complete your Profile so you can post and share photos and videos of your Sailor and share stories with other moms!

Make sure to read our Community Guidelines and this Navy Operations Security (OPSEC) checklist - loose lips sink ships!

Join groups!  Browse for groups for your PIR date, your sailor's occupational specialty, "A" school, assigned ship, homeport city, your own city or state, and a myriad of other interests. Jump in and introduce yourself!  Start making friends that can last a lifetime.

Link to Navy Speak - Navy Terms & Acronyms: Navy Speak

All Hands Magazine's full length documentary "Making a Sailor": This video follows four recruits through Boot Camp in the spring of 2018 who were assigned to DIV 229, an integrated division, which had PIR on 05/25/2018. 

Boot Camp: Making a Sailor (Full Length Documentary - 2018)

Boot Camp: Behind the Scenes at RTC

...and visit Navy.com - America's Navy and Navy.mil also Navy Live - The Official Blog of the Navy to learn more.

OPSEC - Navy Operations Security

Always keep Navy Operations Security in mind.  In the Navy, it's essential to remember that "loose lips sink ships."  OPSEC is everyone's responsibility. 

DON'T post critical information including future destinations or ports of call; future operations, exercises or missions; deployment or homecoming dates.  

DO be smart, use your head, always think OPSEC when using texts, email, phone, and social media, and watch this video: "Importance of Navy OPSEC."

Follow this link for OPSEC Guidelines:

OPSEC GUIDELINES

Events

**UPDATE 4/26/2022** Effective with the May 6, 2022 PIR 4 guests will be allowed.  Still must be fully vaccinated to attend.

**UPDATE as of 11/10/2022 PIR vaccination is no longer required.

**UPDATE 7/29/2021** You now must be fully vaccinated in order to attend PIR:

In light of observed changes and impact of the Coronavirus Delta Variant and out of an abundance of caution for our recruits, Sailors, staff, and guests, Recruit Training Command is restricting Pass-in-Review (recruit graduation) to ONLY fully immunized guests (14-days post final COVID vaccination dose).  

FOLLOW THIS LINK FOR UP TO DATE INFO:

RTC Graduation

**UPDATE 8/25/2022 - MASK MANDATE IS LIFTED.  Vaccinations still required.

**UPDATE 11/10/22 PIR - Vaccinations no longer required.

RESUMING LIVE PIR - 8/13/2021

Please note! Changes to this guide happened in October 2017. Tickets are now issued for all guests, and all guests must have a ticket to enter base. A separate parking pass is no longer needed to drive on to base for parking.

Please see changes to attending PIR in the PAGES column. The PAGES are located under the member icons on the right side.

Format Downloads:

Navy Speak

Click here to learn common Navy terms and acronyms!  (Hint:  When you can speak an entire sentence using only acronyms and one verb, you're truly a Navy mom.)

N4M Merchandise


Shirts, caps, mugs and more can be found at CafePress.

Please note: Profits generated in the production of this merchandise are not being awarded to the Navy or any of its suppliers. Any profit made is retained by CafePress.

Navy.com Para Familias

Visite esta página para explorar en su idioma las oportunidades de educación y carreras para sus hijos en el Navy. Navy.com

Badge

Loading…

Debate Swirls over Female Navy SEALs

Feb 02, 2013

Navy SEALs Carrying Log

A bruised and bloodied female recruit pulls herself to her feet, spits out a mouthful of blood and shouts an unladylike insult at an abusive master chief, instantly earning respect from her male teammates as she becomes the nation's first female commando.

The dramatic scene from "G.I. Jane" suggests that integrating women into a special operations unit is as simple as finding a physically fit woman willing to shave her head and put up with misogynistic jerks.

That was just a movie. This is real life.

Special operations chief Adm. Bill McRaven told a Washington audience this week that he supports allowing women into elite military units, including the SEALs. The comments, made days after defense officials ended the ban on women serving in ground combat, ignited fresh debate among the ranks over whether women could -- or should -- serve alongside America's elite warriors.

There's long been skepticism over whether women can meet the grueling physical standards of special operations. Of those fit enough to make it to Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL training -- an achievement in its own right -- only about 1 in 3 of them become Navy commandos.

McRaven, a former SEAL commander, said it's crucial that women be held to the same high standards as men and that he believes some "will do a phenomenal job."

McRaven has until 2016 to report back to the secretary of defense with a plan to integrate his forces or apply for an exception to continue to restrict women.

His comments drew mixed reactions among former SEALs reached by a reporter this week. Several flatly rejected the idea of bringing women into the force; others said they were open to the idea as long as standards were not lowered.

Even those who oppose allowing women to join the teams concede that a select few would probably make the cut.

"I'm confident there are women who can pass the physical standards; there are women I'm sure that can pass the mental standards," former SEAL officer Cade Courtley said. "But why would you add an element into the most elite special forces that could cause it to be less effective?"

Courtley, who spun his military experience into a reality show and book about survival tactics, imagined what would happen if a woman had been on the team of Virginia Beach-based SEALs tapped to take out Osama bin Laden and learned she was pregnant days before the raid.

"I'm not saying SEALs can't adapt," he said, "but why mess with something that's working?"

Courtley also questioned whether women should train alongside men in humbling circumstances. He described pushing through "hell week," a brutal five days of continuous training during the initial phase of BUD/S.

"At about night number four, when we're lying on metal grates in nothing but our swim shorts, I'm spooning this guy next to me, shivering to death and just hoping that he has to pee because I'll at least get a couple seconds of warmth," said Courtley, who became a SEAL in 1995 and left the service in 2001. "That's how far down we go. Are we really going to add women to that?"

Retired SEAL Don Shipley runs Extreme SEAL Experience in rural Chesapeake, a weeklong program for young men who aspire to join special operations forces. He has refused to open the course to women, despite several requests, because he fears it would deter men from signing up.

He expects the same would happen if women were integrated into SEAL training.

"You cannot even get the majority of the strongest guys in the nation to get through the training," Shipley said. "You're going to deter some those guys from coming out, and for what?"

Larry Bailey, a former SEAL commander who retired in 1990 after 27 years, said even if a woman meets the rigorous physical and mental requirements, she would not be suited for the job "by virtue of her anatomy." The 73-year-old described a scenario in which a female SEAL and her team are swimming toward a target through shark-infested Caribbean waters.

"What happens if her female menstrual cycle starts?" Bailey said. "The sharks will be swarming. That sounds ridiculous, but I use that to make a point. Men and women aren't built the same."

Bailey's hard-line stance doesn't necessarily reflect the views among younger special operations troops, many of whom have served alongside women during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Kevin Maurer, a journalist and Virginia Beach native who has embedded numerous times with special operations units over the past decade, said he has seen commandos come to respect women who often join them on dangerous missions as helicopter pilots or with cultural support teams.

"With special operations guys, everyone earns their place," said Maurer, who co-wrote "No Easy Day" with an ex-SEAL who participated in the bin Laden raid. "It's about earning the green beret, earning the trident. If you can earn it, and if you're held to the same standards, then you will earn that respect."

Lisa Barbarics, a retired Navy chief, worked with SEAL teams as a communications specialist during the late-1990s. She said she felt like she was welcomed as part of the Naval Special Warfare community, but she has doubts about whether a woman would be accepted as a SEAL. She questioned whether many women could make it to that point.

"Having worked with those guys, there may be a few women out there who are capable of meeting those standards," Barbarics said. "I doubt there are very many of them."

One recently retired SEAL who served on deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan said gender shouldn't matter. He shared his views with a reporter on the condition that his name not be published.

Women can be "as ruthless and driven as dudes," the ex-SEAL said in an email, "and once they have proven that they can pass the minimum standard, they should be allowed to roll with us."

He acknowledged that his views are not typical of most of his former teammates. But as long as standards aren't lowered, he said the training could be amended to allow women to participate without needlessly being forced into provocative situations. The change wouldn't be unprecedented.

"When I went through training, we did every run in jungle boots, and we lost 25 percent of the class to shin-splints or leg fractures," the retired SEAL said.

Now, SEALs do some training in running shoes -- and no one accuses them of being soft.

Views: 1240

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hmmm, did you just compare Navy SEAL's to McD's? 

I was thinking the same thing.  Apparently, there isn't a difference between spending several hours standing in a restaurant, flipping burgers and selling fries, then going home to your family, and spending months forward deployed in a combat zone, sleeping up close and personal with your team mates, and being in life and death situations. 

I am fine with a discussion that has a difference of opinion.  I'm not bothered a bit by the fact that concerned dad disagrees with me, you, or Anti M (all of whom are, by the way, females who are also Navy Vets, and who know first hand the challenges women face in the Navy).

But, after this last comment, which is insulting not only to those men who serve on the SEAL teams, but also to those women who may or may not be wishing to serve on the teams, I think I will bow out of this conversation now. 

Because if it's not obvious to all concerned the differences between serving in McDonalds and serving on a SEAL team, or in any military capacity for that matter, then any further discussion is a waste of time.

Yeah, I think I'm with you on this one. Peace out Johnny-boy.  Concernedad, I'll hit you up on the next topic, can't wait! Hope ya'll have a good night, except for you JohnnyC, you go have a Big Mac and think of Chris Kyle while you're chowing down, may he rest in peace.  My thoughts and prayers go out to all who have become victims of our country's last 11 years.  We lost a brave man last week and many many more before that, it's insulting to compare that of which they do to McD's.  

BTW, I think we were all having such a nice and civilized conversation which is awesome, so glad we could do that!  Sorry it went south Concernedad.

Hmmmmmm.  I didn't think John C was comparing being a Seal to flipping burgers, although the remark was certainly non-sequitur. It's an open forum. We are all allowed to be ignoramuses on occasions. I was enjoying the differences of opinion.

No, you're right BQB and I really thought we were having a civil convo (I'm whining that last part can't you tell?) But it really is insulting to all who have stood on a Team and especially to those who've lost their lives.  They knew we were at war and they still went and did it anyway. And not all jobs are created equal, just like all pay grades  are not created equal (if that was the case then SR's wouldn't be reporting to the Chiefs and the Chiefs to the officers, we'd all run around trying to flex big guns LOL) so if he wasn't really comparing them to McD's then I'm sorry but, it sure sounded that way. 

I interpreted it as "look, we've made progress with equality, we are poised for more progress".    But I'm charitable this morning.   

OK, I'm going to do Claggart a favor by taking some of the heat off of him.

I'm going to go out on a limb and state that the women who could actually qualify to become a SEAL member (if the qualifications were exactly the same), will not look like Demi Moore. Not to mention, there's a fair chance their sexual preference may lie along the same lines as the men.

Oh crap, don't be an idiot.  No one is looking at faces, or even boobs.  All cats are gray in the dark.  

And to imply a female who would qualify as a SEAL would be a lesbian...  that's just insulting.  Might or might not be true, but the way you phrase that, it comes across as misogynistic.  

I think that is societal rather than gender-based.   My SIL is a championship shooter, and she can beat the pants of any man so far.  She was raised with guns, more common for sons to go shooting with dad than daughters.  

If shooting straight was the only requirement to being a SEAL, there'd be a whole lot more of them.

When you have one of these, you don't have to be an expert marksman (markswoman?)

Well, I wouldn't necessarily say it's a bad idea just one that needs more thought process before jumping into it head first.  I just hope should our military ever take this route, that Big Navy really thinks long and hard and considers every aspect before doing so.  Especially consulting those that it will affect the most, SEAL's.  If any feel like they would not continue being a SEAL due to this change, then yes, it is a bad idea because what they are doing now works and let us not always try to fix what isn't broken right? Nice to meet you BTW.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Navy for Moms Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service